Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition

googleadmoblogo Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob AcquisitionOver six months after announcing its plans to acquire leading mobile ad network AdMob, Google has finally closed the deal. The news comes a week after the FTC unanimously approved the deal, after holding it up for months as it decided whether or not to block it on antitrust grounds.

When it finally reached a decision, the FTC pointed to Apple’s recent entry into the mobile ad market with iAds as evidence that there would still be plenty of competition in the nascent mobile advertising space (an argument that we made before, as did many others). The FTC may have also been swayed by blog posts from developers questioned during the FTC inquiry who felt that the deal should go through. Some developers also wrote that they felt like the FTC had an agenda and that they were being pressured to say things that would hurt Google’s cause.

Information provided by CrunchBase

 Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition

 Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition
 Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition

 Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition  Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition

 Over Six Months Later, Google Finally Closes AdMob Acquisition

 News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple

 News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple

Today at TechCrunch Disrupt in New York, we had a panel entitled “Does The iPad Change Everything For News, Or Is It Still All About The Web?” The New York Times’ David Carr moderated the panel which included angel investor Ron Conway, Huffington Post CEO Eric Hippeau, and Bloomberg chief content officer Norm Pearlstine. The common theme? The only thing that can stop the iPad is Apple.

While that may sound confusing (since, of course, Apple makes the iPad), everyone seemed to agree that Apple’s restrictions could end up hurting the device in the long run. Apple is in control right now because they’re the first to market with a killer product, but others will emulate them, reasons Pearlstine. He believes a lot of the content on these type of tablets will eventually be web-based rather than app-based (similar to an argument Google co-founder Sergey Brin made last week).

Carr extended on that question, asking if maybe the iPad itself would just be a device where you consume content on the web rather than through apps?Hippeau says that’s up to Apple. Clearly they want to push people towards apps, behind their wall, he believes. The problem with this is that Apple doesn’t give back nearly as much data as having your own website would, Hippeau says. He thinks Apple will have to learn that media organizations live  off of this data. “They’ll have to open it up more,” he says.

Pearlstine agrees, saying that the key for traditional publishers is their lists of subscribers. More importantly, they have their payment information. With iPad apps, Apple has that information, and that will be a problem for a lot of media companies. “There will be other providers that won’t do it the Apple way,” he says. That, again, is implying that while Apple may have jump-started the industry, if they don’t open up a bit more, a competitor will beat them.

Of course, that hasn’t happened with the iPhone yet. But Android is charging fast.

Conway believes that Apple has a good lead for now though thanks to its “fantastic user interface.” He sees publishers flocking to it just like the music business did to the iPod/iTunes combo. “It’s a better model than free,” he says.

Watch live streaming video from disrupt at livestream.com

 News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple

 News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple
 News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple

 News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple  News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple

 News Panel: The Only Thing That Can Stop The iPad Is Apple

We're not sure what's going on in Vietnam these days but it's suddenly a hot bed for industry leaks. Perhaps it's due to manufacturers expanding from China to Vietnam's relatively cheap (but limited) labor pool? Or maybe it's because the kids at Tinhte are just resourceful as hell? Whatever it is, they've just scooped themselves what appears to be an unannounced MacBook update (identifying itself as a MacBook7,1) that includes a faster 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor (up from 2.26GHz) and NVIDIA GeForce 320M graphics with 256MB of DDR3 SDRAM (an update from the GeForce 9400M found in the current MacBook6,1) -- right, the same CPU and GPU as the entry level 13-inch MacBook Pro but for only $999 (assuming Apple maintains the same entry-level pricing). These minor bumps aren't enough to warrant a model change, however, as we're still seeing "Model No: A1342" stamped on the box. Of course, this could be an elaborate hoax, but Tinhte has an impressive track record and these MacBook specs are right in line with what we'd expect since the white MacBook was last updated in October 2009. No word on when we'll see these announced but it's gotta be soon -- Tuesday perhaps, with a refreshed MacBook Air if we're lucky. Video unboxing after the break and plenty of pics for Zaprudering at the source link below.

Continue reading Apple MacBook refresh leaked in Vietnam (video)

Apple MacBook refresh leaked in Vietnam (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 15 May 2010 08:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  post label source Apple MacBook refresh leaked in Vietnam (video)Tinhte  | Email this | Comments

 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...

 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...Earlier today, at the insistence of a collation of media organizations including Wired and Cnet, a judge unsealed an affidavit the iPhone 4G leak case that has uncovered many more details about the case. The documents, which contain the affidavit of Detective Matthew Broad of the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office, affirm that it was Apple that sparked the police investigation, and offers a timeline of events leading up to the police raid of Gizmodo editor’s Jason Chen’s house. We’ve embedded the full document below, via Cnet.

In the documents, it’s revealed that Steve Jobs personally contacted Gizmodo about getting the phone back (Gizmodo responded that it wanted Apple to officially state that the phone was theirs). It also reveals that Apple has claimed that Gizmodo damaged the prototype iPhone during the course of taking it apart:

“Sewell said that upon returning to Apple, employees attempted to power the phone and found that it no longer functioned. Upon examining the phone, they found the following damage occurred to it as a result of the phone being disassembling[sic]:
1. Broken ribbon cable
2. One screw was inserted into the wrong location and caused an electrical short
3. Back plate snaps were broken.
4. Stripped Screws.”

At one point in the document, the story of how Gray Powell probably lost the phone is detailed (note that this supports the claims by Gizmodo that it was not actually stolen out of Gray Powell’s possession):

“Powell said he sat at the bar with his uncle. He said the last memory he had of the prototype phone was placing it in his bag, which he then put on the floor by his feet. Powell said that his bag was knocked over at one point in time and it was possible the prototype iPhone fell out of the bag onto the floor.

I asked Powell if it was possible that someone stole the prototype iPhone from his bag. He said he did leave his bag with his uncle at one point during the evening when he went to the bathroom and it was possible, although unlikely, that someone removed the prototype iPhone from his bag”.

But most interesting, at least on our first read-through of the documents, are the bizarre chain of events that took place as the investigation closed in on Brian Hogan and Thomas Warner — the two young men allegedly working together to sell the phone after Hogan found it in a bar. Police were allegedly tipped off about the involvement of the two men by their roommate, a woman named Katherine Martinson, who was concerned that she would be considered an accomplice to the young men because Hogan had used her computer to try syncing the iPhone 4G prototype.

“Orloff said that Witness Martinson contacted him due to the fact that Suspect Hogan connected the stolen iPhone to her computer and she believed that Apple would eventually trace the iPhone back to her via IP address. Therefore she contacted Apple in order to absolve herself of criminal responsibility…”

The documents allege that when Martinson tried to talk Hogan out of selling the iPhone because it would “ruin the carer of Robert ‘Gray’ Powell”, Hogan responded “Sucks for him. He lost his phone. Shouldn’t have lost his phone.”

The documents then go on to detail the night of April 21, when Hogan and Warner allegedly tried to hide evidence that tied them to the phone. It’s a bizarre tale. Warner, who had two outstanding misdemeanor warrants, allegedly tried to hide a laptop at a church, and after saying he didn’t know where a missing thumb drive and flash card were, said that they were hidden in a bush in Redwood City. Here are the passages describing the events of that night:
story1 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...
story2 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...
story3 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...
story4 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...

 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...

 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...
 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...

 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...  Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...

 Unsealed iPhone 4G Affidavit: Phone’s Sellers Allegedly Tried To...

 Page 10 of 24  « First  ... « 8  9  10  11  12 » ...  Last »