ipad 600 How would you change Apples iPad?

To say that Apple's iPad has driven the tablet market straight into an era of revival would be understating things greatly, and one million units later, we're here to ask the earliest of adopters how they'd tweak things if they were ever lucky enough to take over where Jonathan Ive left off. We already know that select changes are coming in iPhone OS 4.0, and the recent Spirit jailbreak has also opened up a whole new world of possibilities, but there's always work to be done, right? Would you have included a USB port and SD card slot along the edges? Designed it for use on other carriers? Made the screen a bit bigger / smaller? Thrown in a front-facing camera? Go on, spill your deepest, darkest wishes for Apple's first tablet in comments below. Someone will listen, we promise.

How would you change Apple's iPad? originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 07 May 2010 23:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

 A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…

 A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: a guy walks into a bar. No, a guy walks into a bar with an iPhone. No, a guy walks into a bar with a next-generation iPhone disguised as a current-generation iPhone. No, a guy walks into a bar with his next-generation iPhone disguised as a current-generation iPhone and leaves it there. Okay, we’ve never heard anything like this before.

Yes, it appears that the next hardware iteration of the iPhone (two common monikers are ‘iPhone 4G’ or the ‘iPhone HD’) has been outed. And while the apparent specs are sexy (higher rez screen, front-facing camera, bigger battery, etc), the story behind the leaked device seems even more interesting.

The Pictures

This weekend, Engadget ran pictures of the device, stating that they were taken by someone who found it on the floor of a San Jose bar (!). The pictures were a little blurry and didn’t show the device running, so naturally, many were skeptical. In fact, shortly after Engadget’s post, a number of sites, including MacRumors, were reporting that the images were actually of a cheap Asian knock-off of the iPhone.

Engadget came back with another post supposedly proving the device was real (noting the same device appeared to be in an early leaked picture of the iPad). Then Daring Fireball’s John Gruber talked to some of his sources and concluded that the device was, in fact, real (but wasn’t sure if it was a prototype unit or the real deal). MacRumors then came back and reported that the story about it being an Asian knock-off was itself fake.

Then things got really interesting.

The Hands-On

In Engadget’s initial post, they noted that the author of the pictures was offering to sell some hands-on time with the device for an unstated fee. For some unknown reason (perhaps so as not to tip off rivals), Engadget quickly removed this part from the post. But it didn’t matter, because it appears that rival gadget blog, Gizmodo, jumped on the opportunity to pay for access to the device. Only they didn’t just pay for face-time, they bought the whole thing.

After playing around with it for a few days, this morning, Gizmodo ran a full review of the device including several pictures and videos. Judging from this review, which includes a look inside the device, it does appear that this thing is very real.

 A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…

The Skepticism

Still, that isn’t stopping others from continuing to claim that the hardware is fake. (They apparently believe that the insides of an iPhone 3G were simply ripped out and stuffed into this Asian rip-off case — a claim that seems highly unlikely, at best – and ludicrous, at worst.)

Others are suggesting this was a controlled leak by Apple. This also seems highly unlikely. It is believed that Apple does leak out information from time to time — notably to the Wall Street Journal — but it’s never hardware. Pulling a Nine Inch Nails and leaking USB drives with new songs in concert venue bathrooms is simply not the Apple way of doing things. They’re more subtle, and let journalists draw their own (sometimes wrong) conclusions.

The Legality

There are still a few oddities to all of this. First, assuming this is real, it is definitely the most high-profile leak of all time out of the super-secretive Apple. Hell, it may be the most high-profile hardware leak of all time from any company. If there has ever been anything that will draw the wrath of Apple’s legal team, this would seem to be it. And yet, if Gizmodo (or its parent, Gawker) have gotten a take-down notice, they haven’t let it be known yet.

It’s possible, and likely even probable, that Apple is taking this as something worthy of action much more serious than the fairly common takedown notices the company sends from time to time. As Gruber noted earlier today, according to his sources, Apple considers this device to be not lost, but stolen.

The Money

And that angle comes into play when you consider that Gawker did, in fact, pay for the device.

Also interesting is a tweet from Engadget writer (and former attorney) Nilay Patel, “Here’s an interesting fact: in California, the finder of a lost item is required to tell the police and turn it over to rightful owner.” It’s not clear if that’s why Engadget did not purchase the device after posting the pictures.

The price paid for the device is not known, though a $10,000 figure is being thrown around (others are saying $5,000 plus traffic bonuses). As you might imagine, the traffic for Gizmodo have been huge today, something above 3 million hits already. Some have tried to calculate out if this makes the $10,000 worth it (based on ad revenues). But, as Gawker’s Erin Pettigrew points out, “Ad demand only matches ad supply that way if using remnant networks/exchanges. We’re not, so no real rev gain in news spikes.”

The Power

Then there’s the whole issue of Gizmodo not being able to power on the device, despite having it. While it is possible to remote wipe iPhones, this wouldn’t completely kill the device, just remove all its data. But perhaps Apple built a special kill functionality into this prototype unit for situations exactly like this. The device does show a “Connect to iTunes” screen (which is how Gizmodo is able to judge the higher-resolution screen), but that is all.

 A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…The Pledge

Finally, you have to wonder how the hell Apple let someone out of the building with this device. Apple is known to lock employees in rooms (entered through several secure doors) in order to use new devices. It’s even believed that sometimes they make people working on the devices do so under black cloaks. Naturally, the people in these rooms are monitored at all times.

The Turn

So if someone left Apple with this product, you almost have to believe it was a high-level executive. But still, what on Earth are they doing bringing it to a bar? (Maybe one of their kids swiped it from home? Who knows.) Yes, Apple employees were spotted in the wild with the original iPhone before it’s launch, but that device had already been unveiled on stage by Steve Jobs months earlier. This is much, much different.

The Prestige

On the other hand, you almost have to believe that this device was meant to leave 1 Inifite Loop — that’s why it had the false iPhone 3G cover. Apple may have given a few of these devices out to trusted employees in this disguise to test in real-world situations. After all, if this thing does have a new type of back (glass, ceramic?), they’ll want to know how the wireless radio performs before it’s released to the public.

The Unprecedented

Often, the best tech stories have interesting backstories — and this certainly fits the bill. We’re likely two months away from the actual unveiling of the iPhone HD (we’ll go with that name for now, given the screen resolution), and yet, we’ve apparently already seen it. With Apple, given the lengths they go to to make sure something like this doesn’t happen, it’s unprecedented.

And while I’m sure Apple is beyond pissed off about this leak, it has the Apple base super-excited about the future today — even as the apparently best Android phone yet, the Droid Incredible, is set to launch. All anyone is talking about is the iPhone. As usual.

Of course, this means that when Steve Jobs takes the stage in June, he may actually need a “one more thing” moment. Without it, we may be bored by a presentation full of what we already know.

 A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…  A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…  A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…  A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…  A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…  A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…

 A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…
 A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…

 A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…  A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…  A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…  A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…  A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…

 A Next Generation iPhone Walks Into A Bar…

 The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...

bluesky The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...
There’s a trend that’s been disturbing me lately. When the topic of modding or jailbreaking comes up — say, in the wake of the iPad announcement, or Sony’s restrictive PS3 update — there is an outcry. Who am I to tell Apple what’s best for their devices? How can I in good conscience urge others to void their warranties or break license agreements? And why should anyone care when only a small proportion of people hack or jailbreak their devices?

These questions are natural, because a few years ago they wouldn’t even be possible. What reason would you have for breaking open an first-generation iPod, or hacking an original Playstation? The question of “unauthorized software” on System 9 and Windows XP was plainly moot. But as the capabilities of the PC, console, and phone have expanded, so have their magisteria. And as their power grew, so did their chains. These chains were so light before that we didn’t notice them, but now that they are not only visible but are beginning to truly encumber our devices, we must consider whether we are right to throw them off. The answer, to me at least, seems obvious: no company or person has the right to tell you that you may not do what you like with your own property.

Continue reading…

 The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...  The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...  The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...  The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...  The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...  The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...

 The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...
 The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...

 The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...  The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...  The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...  The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...  The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...

 The User’s Manifesto: In Defense Of Hacking, Modding, And...

 Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...

etch a sketch Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...Thirty five years ago, give or take, I was presented with my first etch-a-sketch. And it looked a little bit like the iPad. Which makes me qualified to declare the iPad the future of media.

Or at least, that’s the logic of an article in today’s Guardian by Alan Rusbridger, who says that a block of wood that he saw sixteen years ago showed him the future. And that future was the iPad.

“My personal journey to the iPad began around 16 years ago in Aspen, Colorado,” Rusbridger begins. He saw a website showing a newspaper online and was duly impressed. “But the real excitement lay in Aspen, where the Knight Ridder newspaper chain had set up a “laboratory” to study the future of news. It was rumoured that they had built a “tablet” – a portable screen on which people could read newspapers.”

The tablet he saw was a block of wood with a printout of a newspaper glued on the front. No, I’m not kidding.

“At present it consists only of an A4 block of wood, with a ‘front page’ stuck on it: the technology for creating Fidler’s ‘Flat Pad’ is, he estimates, still a couple of years off.

And the iPad finally fulfilled that dream. “Here it was – the Aspen block of wood incarnate!” says Rusbridger when his iPad arrived.

The iPad Will Not Fix Your Newspaper

Rusbridger then goes on to talk about how perfect the iPad is to consumer the Internet (no disagreement from me on that point). And he suggests the iPad might be the knight in shining armor who rushes in to save the day for newspapers: “So is the iPad the future of newspapers after all?”

The best I can tell is that the newspaper guys envision people sitting on a train on the way to work reading their iPad. That’s similar to people sitting on a train read the newspaper. And since those two things are similar, voila!, the iPad will save newspapers.

Seriously, that’s as far as the argument goes.

But jumping back to reality…the iPad changes everything, which really means nothing has changed. All the pressures the Internet put on newspapers – crushing the business model, unlimited competition, no need for tree massacres – are just amplified by the iPad.

Now would be the time to embrace the Internet. But the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and other are running in the opposite direction with apps that have no hyperlinks and/or require a fee to get access. All those people sitting on trains with their iPads are going to do the same thing that all those people sitting in their offices on their laptops did – get their news from free sources that hyperlink to other free sources.

The etch-a-sketch was very, very cool. But it didn’t give newspapers a competitive advantage and a way to stay alive a little longer. And neither does the iPad.

Information provided by CrunchBase

 Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...  Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...  Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...  Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...  Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...  Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...

 Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...
 Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...

 Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...  Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...  Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...  Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...  Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...

 Just Because I Loved My Etch A Sketch Doesn’t Mean The iPad Will...

 Page 11 of 24  « First  ... « 9  10  11  12  13 » ...  Last »