g pon verizon fios Verizon FiOS field trial introduces XG PON2 to the lexicon, shows...

Verizon's FiOS footprint may be on an expansion hiatus, but that's not to say the company's abandoning existing users. Nearly 3.5 years after boosting FiOS internet speeds with G-PON, the company is now out testing XG-PON2 -- a newfangled iteration that somehow enables 10Gbps upstream and downstream from its existing fiber network. If you'll recall, we heard just a few weeks back that the outfit was close to being able to serve GigE on its existing platform, and now that this field trial has been successful, we'd say the boundaries are stretched even further. In the test, technicians were able to suck down a 2.3GB movie in four ticks of the second hand, and if you're hoping to see the nerdiest video of the day, a highlight reel of the trial awaits you just past the break.

[Thanks, David]

Continue reading Verizon FiOS field trial introduces XG-PON2 to the lexicon, shows 10Gbps capabilities

Verizon FiOS field trial introduces XG-PON2 to the lexicon, shows 10Gbps capabilities originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:02:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

comscore 1 comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...U.S. comScore video metrix stats are out today, with the number of video viewers rebounding in the month of May. According to the web metrics company, 183 million U.S. Internet users watched online video during the month compared to 178 million in April. ComScore reports that YouTube saw record viewership in May with an all-time high of 14.6 billion videos viewed and surpassing the threshold of 100 videos per viewer for the first time. The report also showed that 144.1 million viewers watched 14.6 billion videos on YouTube.com (which works out to 101.2 videos per viewer).

In May, U.S. Internet users watched nearly 34 billion videos, with Google Sites taking the top spot with 14.6 billion videos, representing 43.1 percent of all videos viewed online. ComScore says that YouTube accounted for the vast majority of videos viewed at the property. Hulu came in second with 1.2 billion videos, or 3.5 percent of all online videos viewed, a slight increase from April. Microsoft Sites ranked third with 642 million (1.9 percent), followed by Vevo with 430 million (1.3 percent) and Viacom Digital with 347 million (1.0 percent).

According to the release, 84.8 percent of the total U.S. Internet audience viewed online video. The average Hulu viewer watched 27.0 videos, totaling 2.7 hours of video per viewer. The duration of the average online video was 4.3 minutes.

comscore 2 comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...In terms of number of viewers, nearly 183 million viewers watched an average of 186 videos per viewer in May. Google Sites attracted 144.6 million unique viewers during the month (101.2 videos per viewer), followed by Yahoo Sites with 46.0 million viewers (7.3 videos per viewer), and Vevo with 45.6 million viewers (9.4 videos per viewer). Vevo grew again this month, and moved up the list one position in the May ranking taking the #3 spot with 45.6 million viewers and an average of 9.4 videos per viewer.

With respect to video advertising in May, Tremor Media once again took the top spot as the number one video ad network with a potential reach of 102.8 million viewers, or 56.2 percent of the total video viewing audience. ScanScout Network ranked second with a potential reach of 99.3 million viewers (54.3 percent penetration) followed by YuMe Video Network with 87.5 million viewers (47.8 percent).

Information provided by CrunchBase

 comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...

 comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...

 comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...
 comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...

 comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...  comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...

 comScore: YouTube Reaches All Time High of 14.6 Billion Videos Viewed...

 Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream

twitter Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream

Twitterjust put up a blog post talking up its platform approach and long-term strategy. Surprisingly, the company has made some decisions that are sure to irk a couple of third-party developers and startups.

Here’s the big news: aside from Promoted Tweets, Twitter said it will not allow any third party to inject paid tweets into a timeline on any service that leverages the Twitter API.

That’s not so good news for TweetUp (and other Twitter-focused advertising startups like Ad.ly and Twad.ly). Particularly not the former, which just launched its live beta at TechCrunch Disrupt half an hour ago.

Here are the reasons Twitter says it decided not to allow third-parties to advertise in the stream:

First, third party ad networks are not necessarily looking to preserve the unique user experience Twitter has created. They may optimize for either market share or short-term revenue at the expense of the long-term health of the Twitter platform. For example, a third party ad network may seek to maximize ad impressions and click through rates even if it leads to a net decrease in Twitter use due to user dissatisfaction.

Secondly, the basis for building a lasting advertising network that benefits users should be innovation, not near-term monetization. Twitter is uniquely dependent on and responsible for the long-term health and value of the platform. Accordingly, a necessary focus of Promoted Tweets is to explore ways to create value for our users. Third party ad networks may be optimized for near-term monetization at the expense of innovating or creating the best user experience. We believe it is our responsibility to encourage creative product development and to curb practices that compromise innovation.

It is important to keep in mind that Twitter bears all the costs of maintaining the network, protecting the Tweet stream against spam, supporting user requests, and scaling the service. Indeed, Twitter will bear many of the support costs associated with any third-party paid Tweets, as Twitter receives support emails related to anything a user sees in a tweet stream. The third-party bears few of these costs by comparison.

Twitter adds that when its new Annotations feature launches, there are going to be many new business opportunities on the Twitter platform in addition to those currently available.

The company does recognize that for a few companies, the new Terms of Service prohibit activities in which some have invested resources.

It will be interesting to see how those companies will respond to the news. TweetUp, for one, says they never planned to advertise in-stream, so this won’t affect them as much as you would think at first.

Nevertheless, it shows that Twitter’s decisions on the way it moves forward with its platform and how to monetize it most efficiently should keep startups that base their entire business model on the Twitter platform on guard.

Information provided by CrunchBase

 Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream

 Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream
 Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream

 Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream  Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream

 Twitter To Prohibit Any Third Party To Advertise In Stream

 Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons

 Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian LemonsI wrote before that Wall Street has a far bigger fascination with Brazil than Silicon Valley has. But since I got back from Brazil two weeks ago, I’ve had several conversations with Silicon Valley-based investors mulling scouting trips down South. Indeed, I’ve heard that at least one company I wrote about from my last trip to Brazil is deep in some funding negotiations as we speak.

If the left side of the coast of the US is getting serious about doing business in Brazil, there’s someone they need to meet: Edivan Costa. He’s taken one of the biggest threats to Brazilian entrepreneurship, and fittingly, turned it into a startup itself.

Sure Brazil is a growing market, but it’s not easy to build a company there. The government takes one-third of revenues in taxes, and Brazil has European-like labor laws that prevent companies from flexibly hiring and firing—a big negative for a startup ecosystem. But Costa’s company SEDI is helping with one big hurdle new companies face: Bureaucracy. On average, it takes 150 days to open a business in Brazil, requiring dozens of licenses and in many cases those licenses have to be continually renewed. SEDI specializes in making that painless, and Costa has spent 18 years learning how to get the process down to 30-to-40 days—without paying any bribes. He has 90 employees in twelve branches in Brazil.

It’s one thing to start a business in an area other people are ignoring. It’s quite another to start a business out of something everyone else sees as the exact thing that’s thwarting entrepreneurship. Costa always had that entrepreneurial edge—growing up in Rio’s favelas he spent his youth collecting scrap paper and selling it to recyclers to pay for his school books. He thought he’d found his way out through every Brazilian kid’s dream—professional soccer. By the time he was 18, he was playing in the equivalent of the minor leagues in Sao Paulo, when his father fell ill and he had to move back home. He wound up splitting some office space with an attorney, doing his clerk work and eventually started offering that service to other attorneys and companies.

Costa’s story is remarkable for a guy that grew up with few advantages. He was largely uneducated, had no investors and as an Afro-Brazilian he takes issue with the idea that Brazil is free from racism. Soon after starting SEDI, he was driving a nice car with a blond girlfriend on his arm, and a guy in a convenience store asked him if he was a Samba player, a soccer player or a criminal. He says he still gets confused for a security guard in malls, because he wears a suit everywhere he goes. (That’s him in the dramatic picture above.)

But the only color that Costa’s clients care about is the red tape he helps them cut through, by keeping up to date with the myriad of changing regulations. Customers include WalMart, TelMex and Carrefour, along with a lot of other big national brands. He specializes in retail businesses with hundreds of stores spread throughout the country. SEDI did over $3 million US dollars in revenue last year, down from 2008 thanks to the financial crisis. But already in 2010, business is up 25%, Costa says. He serves about 8% of the top 500 companies in Brazil, so there’s clearly a lot of room to grow– or if he’s not careful for a competitor to eat his lunch.

SEDI is a services business that likely won’t be the next big Brazilian IPO. But it could easily enable that company to open its doors. People always say the key to Silicon Valley’s startup infrastructure is the network of professionals skilled at getting a company up and running in a matter of days. Brazil still has a long way to go to get there, clearly, but SEDI helps. This seems like a no-brainer service every emerging market needs.

 Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons

 Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons
 Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons

 Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons  Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons

 Making Lemonade out of Bureaucratic Brazilian Lemons

 Page 1 of 26  1  2  3  4  5 » ...  Last »